Comments on: Response to Fritz Vahrenholt and Sebastian Lüning

By: Kelvin Spyres

Kelvin Spyres — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 06:19:54 +0000

Global warming has become perhaps the most complicated issue facing world leaders. Warnings from the scientific community are becoming louder, as an increasing body of science points to rising dangers from the ongoing buildup of human-related greenhouse gases — produced mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and forests.;

Have a look at the latest content at our personal blog
<'http://www.caramoantourpackage.com/

By: Summer Joyner

Summer Joyner — Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:13:46 +0000

Die Kalte Sonne’s popularity reflects a growing skepticism among the German public about the likelihood of climate catastrophe. Today only 31 per cent of Germans are afraid of global warming. In 2006, the figure was twice as many.

By: Aleksander

Aleksander — Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:31:48 +0000

Fritz Varenholts book is a corageous, well documented and much needed statement of the real fact behind all the propaganda and manipulated science from IPCC.

By: Bart

Bart — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:51:08 +0000

Hi Tom, see the new post about the climate science survey questions.

By: thomaswfuller2

thomaswfuller2 — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:33:49 +0000

HIya Bart,

Are you going to post on the new survey? I’m very interested.

By: Kath MacDonald

Kath MacDonald — Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:56:02 +0000

Excellent post and much appreciated. I have far too many acquaintances that are buying into what Vahrenholt has proclaimed. Nice to see some common sense in a response to his argument.

By: Bart

Bart — Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:07:59 +0000

Jeff,

You ask for something that you know the answer to yourself:

We have imperfect knowledge of past climate through proxies of many different kinds (including but not limited to icecores, foraminifera, sediments, treerings).

Paul,

Just checked, but couldn’t find a comment of yours in the spam filter. Sorry about that.

By: Jeff Condon

Jeff Condon — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:46:35 +0000

“It’s telling that no physics-based climate model has been developed that can simulate past and recent climate changes without a substantial warming effect from an increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. ”

But how do we know the past?

By: Paul Kelly

Paul Kelly — Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:31:20 +0000

Eli,

It looks like we’re on our own here. Nature’s How to talk to a denier article made the case for replacing the info deficit model with a focus on cooperative effort model. The reaction to it is instructive. One side freaks over a word. The other says get over it. Both ignore the substance of the paper.

The new model is simple to apply. In the old model every discussion must include education on the science and the threat. In the new model, every discussion must include a search for any agreement for any reason, no matter how large or how small, on action toward the solutions.

By: Paul Kelly

Paul Kelly — Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:10:11 +0000

I tried commenting the other day and it wouldn’t post. Trying now.didn’t